Do you need to fly a family of four from Denver to Santa Fe with skis and a weekend’s luggage? Get a 182. Do you run a skydiving operation or a survey company that needs reliability and power? Get a 182. Do you want to explore the backcountry strips of Idaho or the beaches of the Bahamas without worrying about runway length? Get a .
| Aircraft | Pros vs. Skylane | Cons vs. Skylane | |----------|-------------------|------------------| | | Faster (180+ knots), parachute (CAPS), modern composite airframe. | Doubles the price ($700k used), higher insurance, smaller cabin, less utility. | | Diamond DA40 | Fantastic visibility, Euro styling, lower fuel burn. | Slower than Skylane, less useful load, tighter rear seats. | | Piper Cherokee 235/Dakota | Simple, stout gear, good hauler. | Out of production, less comfortable, slower cruise, smaller parts market. | | Cessna 172 Skyhawk | Cheap to buy and operate, easy to fly. | Over 30 knots slower, carries 500 lbs less, frustrating for long trips. | skylane cessna 182
If the Cessna 172 is the Toyota Corolla of the sky—reliable, easy, and economical—the is the legendary Ford F-150: brawnier, faster, more capable of hauling a heavy load, and built to handle rough conditions. From bush pilots in the Alaskan wilderness to private owners flying weekend cross-countries, the Skylane is the pilot’s choice when the Skyhawk simply isn’t enough. Do you need to fly a family of